Hill resigned from The Law Offices of Eddie Farah on Oct. 13, 2004 because its overcharging practices presented him with an irreconcilable conflict of interest as an attorney representing its clients. His resignation letter speaks for itself. Hill believes, "The firm's clients must be informed of its practice of misappropriating funds from similarly situated clients. Without that information, clients cannot make informed decisions concerning the law firm they choose to entrust with their legal representation. On the other hand, disclosure of such information would expose my employer and its principals to risk of financial, professional and criminal sanctions."
Hill considered the conflict of interest urgent enough to forgo giving advance notice of his resignation to The Law Offices of Eddie Farah. He explains, "I couldn’t very well say, ‘Here’s two weeks notice of my resignation because you have been defrauding your clients and I’ve reported you to the State Bar.’ I didn’t think that would be a workable situation. What would I do for the two weeks, inform clients the firm was defrauding other clients, or keep my mouth shut and violate my ethical responsibilities?"
City of Jacksonville and State of Florida officials refused to look into reports of the law firm's overcharging practices, ostensibly because The Florida Bar has exclusive jurisdiction. By letter dated Jan. 10, 2005, Hill reported the firm's repeated acts of consumer theft and fraud to the Office of Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, who is now also a 2006 gubernatorial candidate who says, "I am running for Governor to fight for the people of Florida...." Hill's letter to Crist's office included supporting documentation from ten cases in which the firm grossly overcharged clients, and emphasized, “Given the frequency and duration of [the firm’s] overcharging practice, many clients and considerable sums of money are involved in these matters."
Crist's Office responded by letter dated Jan. 24, 2005 simply identifying The Florida Bar as the agency responsible for reviewing grievances against Florida lawyers. That letter gave no reason for failing to investigate offenses committed by the law firm itself, a professional association. Says Hill, "I've been a lawyer for over eighteen years and know of no legal authority exempting law firms operating as professional associations from being investigated and, if appropriate, prosecuted under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act".
To Hill's surprise, a full year went by with no contact from anyone on behalf of The Florida Bar to investigate his report of widescale fraud and misappropriation of clients' funds by The Law Offices of Eddie Farah. Not a single inquiry from The Florida Bar by letter, email or telephone.
"...[T]he Office of the Attorney General for the State of Florida is the enforcing authority for Florida Statutes 501, Part II. This is the unfair and deceptive trade practices act and violations of that act carries penalties of $10,000.00 per violation."
Agreeing with Jefferson's assessment, Hill sent a copy of this Aug. 29, 2005 email to Attorney General Charlie Crist again requesting that he initiate an investigation into the firm's overcharging practices if he considered it appropriate to do so. Unsurprisingly, Hill heard nothing further from Crist's office.
By email dated Oct. 27, 2005 Spangler succinctly responded, "The file to which you refer was closed. The grievance committee considered the matter after investigation and an audit by the Bar Staff Auditor, and found there was no probable cause to pursue disciplinary proceedings. They did elect to send a letter of advice to the firm."
According to The Florida Bar's web site, "The Florida Bar has an important role in the regulation of lawyer misconduct. A complaint of unprofessional conduct against a Florida Bar member is a serious matter. The processing and investigation of inquiries and complaints are a basic responsibility of the Bar as mandated by the Florida Supreme Court. The Bar seeks to protect the public from unethical lawyers."
It's difficult to fathom how The Florida Bar's grievance committee could reach an informed decision concerning probable cause to pursue disciplinary proceedings without ever even contacting the person reporting the misconduct. According to Hill, "The firm overcharged hundreds of unsuspecting clients over a period spanning several years and the combined misappropriated funds are estimated at several hundred thousand dollars."
Hill reiterated his concerns to Spangler by letter dated Oct. 31, 2005. Questioning the thoroughness of the grievance committee's investigation and audit by the staff auditor, he sent a public records request to The Florida Bar for its complete file. It was only after repeated follow up requests that the Bar finally complied and produced what it claims to be the complete records. Notably, the records The Bar produced offer no clues to the basis for the grievance committee's finding of no probable cause for disciplinary proceedings. There are no indications any Bar investigators even contacted any of the witnesses Hill identified by name. Even the grievance committee's Nov. 8, 2005 Notice of No Probable Cause and Letter of Advice fails to explain the basis for its finding.
Why is Hill I speaking out about his discovery of The Law Offices of Eddie Farah's widespread overcharging practices? He explains, "It’s been well over a year since I reported the firm’s misappropriation of clients' funds to The Florida Bar and Florida Attorney General Crist's office. Crist's office deferred to The Florida Bar to investigate the reported fraud. The Florida Bar in turn closed its file without even contacting the person reporting the misconduct or, apparently, any of the witnesses who had been identified. It's hard to have faith in a system that allows such attorney misconduct to go unacknowledged and uncorrected even after it's been identified, documented and reported. Plainly stated, justice hasn’t been served and nobody seems too concerned about it. Who protects the clients who The Law Offices of Eddie Farah overcharged? This experience makes me wonder if I’m naive in believing the misuse of clients' funds to be among the worst offenses a lawyer can commit."
It is undisputed The Law Offices of Eddie Farah overcharged many clients by substantial sums. Attorney John A. Weiss, Esq. of Tallahassee represented the firm's principals, attorneys and brothers Eddie and Chuck Farah, before the Bar. Weiss admitted the firm's overcharges in a Sept. 22, 2005 letter to The Bar stating,
"As an aside, I would advise you that the firm has refunded in excess of $120,000.00 ... to those clients who were inadvertently overcharged for costs. Approximately $10,000.00 remains undisbursed because the firm, and the private investigator it subsequently hired, could not find the individuals."
That certainly sounds like a lot of money to be 'inadvertently' overcharged. The firm would have to overcharge 400 clients by $300 each to reach $120,000. Even The Florida Bar's own audit of the firm's trust account confirmed $130,000 in overcharges and a lack of substantial compliance with Bar rules governing trust acounts in the years 2002 through 2004. Certified Public Accountant and Certified Fraud Examiner James F. Wells prepared the report following his audit of Farah's trust account records and procedures. Wells' Audit Report notes,
"Administrative costs that were not substantiated by documentary evidence were charged on some settlement statements in personal injury cases. These administrative costs were in excess of the documented costs such as copies, faxes and postage. Rule 5-1.2(b)(4) requires documentary support for all disbursements from the trust account. These costs were not authorized by the clients."
In discussing corrective action taken, Wells states,
"The firm reviewed client files and settlement statements to determine the specific clients that had been charged unsubstantiated administrative costs. Refunds totaling approximately $130,000, including interest, were issued to those clients."
Wells concludes,
"In my opinion, Mr. Farah's trust accounting records and procedures in connection with the documentation of costs paid from trust funds during the period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004 were not in substantial compiance with The Florida Bar's rules governing trust accounts." (Emphasis supplied).
According to a Dec. 1, 2005 article in The Florida Bar News a first look at an "extensive review of the Florida Bar’s disciplinary process" was on the agenda for the Bar's Board of Governors when it met Dec. 16, 2005 at Amelia Island. Bar President-elect and Board of Governors member Henry Matson Coxe III chairs the Special Commission on Lawyer Regulation. Coincidentally, Coxe's law office is within easy walking distance and down the street from The Law Offices of Eddie Farah in Jacksonville. By email to Coxe on Dec. 5, 2005, Hill requested the manner in which his complaint of misconduct was handled be included in the Board of Governor's "extensive review" of the Bar’s disciplinary process at the meeting. Hill says, "I've heard nothing from Coxe about the matter and don't expect to since it's been almost four months since I contacted him. I copied most of the Florida Bar's Board of Governors on my email to Coxe and I haven't heard from any of them either."
According to a Jan. 6, 2006 letter from Spangler, "The Florida Bar cannot impose disciplinary action against a law firm, only against individual lawyers."
This case clearly shows a loophole unscrupulous attorneys can easily exploit to the public’s harm. If law firms themselves are not subject to disciplinary action by The Florida Bar, why won't Attorney General Crist's office investigate the professional assocation's documented overcharging practices under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act? Is it because the professional association in question just happens to be a politically well-connected law firm rather than some other business? Someone must be responsible for protecting clients defrauded by law firms and the public needs to know who that is. If it's not the City of Jacksonville, The Florida Bar or the Florida Attorney General's Office, who is it?
By email dated Jan. 28, 2006, Hill asked 2006 gubernatorial candidate Crist to explain the Florida Attorney General's office's position on this problem for voters. As might be Crist's office again failed to respond.
Unresponsiveness by Crist's office has necessitated calling on Florida Governor Jeb Bush to look into what appears to be selective enforcement of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. After almost three weeks with no response from Crist, Hill sent a Feb. 14, 2006 email to Governor Bush asking him to help correct a situation harmful to the public interest and more widespread than many imagine.
In stark contrast to Crist's office, Governor Bush's office promptly responded by email dated Feb. 22, 2006 from Warren Davis of the Governor's Office of Citizens' Services. Davis stated, "Governor Bush is glad you took the time to share your perspective and asked me to respond on his behalf."
Davis suggested, "I encourage you to continue working with the Attorney General's office to resolve your concerns in this regard. As you know, the Attorney General is a state elected official who has administrative authority over his office and those under his supervision."
According to Davis, "Governor Bush wants to know how Floridians feel about the many critical issues we face, and promises to keep your ideas in mind as he forms policy for addressing these concerns."
"Unfortunately, it seems futile to continue working with Attorney General Crist's office to resolve my concerns, I've contacted his office on several occasions over the last year with no results. Pursuing the issues through the media will hopefully prove productive."
"Selective enforcement of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act when well-connected law firms are involved is gaining increasing attention this election year. By email dated Jan. 28, 2006, I asked Florida Attorney General Crist to explain what his office's position is concerning this issue. So far, no response whatsoever. Seems like we Florida voters deserve better, particularly from a man who aspires to be our next Governor."
"Unresponsiveness by Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist's office is what led me to call upon Governor Bush. to look into the situation. Thank you and the Governor taking the time to consider and respond to my concerns."
Says Hill, "I have faith that Governor Bush will stand by his promise to keep my ideas concerning Crist's Selective Enforcement of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act in mind as he forms policy addressing the critical issues facing Floridians. He's a Bush, after all, and I have yet to be disappointed by him, his brother or father."
Contact Phone: 904-396-5555
Web Address of Company and/or Person:
Entered By: Jeffrey R. Hill Privacy Mail Find more referrals, complaints, or rebuttals regarding FARAH, FARAH & ABBOTT, P.A. a/k/aThe Law Offices of Eddie Farah:
