.............
Updated ..
R.D. Skidmore Corner: A new teacher rating system - A State of Education

R.D. Skidmore

A State of Education

My lawyer says I can sue the school because they're violating my right to be stupid


When School Superintendents are asked about the normal high school graduate, they report that they are happy if their graduating 12th graders are reading, writing and calculating at an 8th grade level



November 14, 2003
In April of 1983, the National Commission on Excellence in Education presented to President Reagan and the American People their findings on education in “A Nation at Risk.”

Their findings: “The educational foundations of our society are presently being eroded by a rising tide of mediocrity that threatens our very future as a nation and a people . . . if an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.”

This report put education reform at the top every state and even the national agenda. Education is the dominant budget item.

Educators talk about standards, new standards, enforced standards, and improved curriculum development.

Yet, over the past twenty years story after story surfaces about education being “dumbed” down. Our students perform, on a world standard, at the bottom in mathematics, sciences, national language skills, and are basically void of their national history. President Bush even put education first with his “No Child Left Behind” legislation.

School Superintendents and High School principals always report about the few exceptional students that go on to university education. But when asked about the normal high school graduate, they report that they are happy if their graduating 12th graders are reading, writing and calculating at an 8th grade level—meaning the normal student is performing below 8th grade standards.

It is reported that in California 80% of new students entering Community Colleges require one or two courses in remedial English and mathematics before they are ready for College English or Mathematics. To the credit of the Community College, they are able to prepare these, now, adult learners to be successful with continued education.

Educational accomplishment can also be translated into earning power

In 1997, the RAND Company presented a report, “Breaking the Social Contract,” stating that the high school graduate of 2015 will have a purchasing power 40+% less than their high school graduate grandparent of 1976. To put this in perspective: if the high school graduate of 1976 earned $12,000 per year, which represents their purchasing power (the ability to pay rent, utilities, buy food, etc.), the 2015 graduate will be earn only $7,200—a hefty pay cut!

In the market place, the United States Labor Department reports, statistically, that the trend for employers is to only hire College degreed individuals (Associates degree or Bachelors degree) for entry-level
positions when they used to fill them with high school graduates.

In the supply and demand world, employers are the demanders of educated and modestly skilled labor, and schools are the suppliers. Employers are leaving the inferiorly trained High School graduate for the improved college trained.

Are our Community Colleges and Universities now providing a true measure of the high school graduate?

Popular recognition of poor educational quality control has led to calls for student testing as a condition for high school graduation, but is met with resistance from the education establishment.

In California, the passing score for the high school exit exam was lowered to 55%, and delayed because too many students would fail.

Now the state Board of Education voted to remove some of the more difficult math and English questions to make its exit exam even easier. But according to board member Carol S. Katzman, “I don’t think we’re dumbing down the test in any way.”

Students will face more questions about computing averages -- a skill taught in sixth grade -- and using estimation to check whether results are reasonable, a seventh-grade math standard.

English questions will also be pared -- deleting a requirement that students write a bibliography of reference materials, develop research questions and methods to "elicit and present evidence from primary and secondary sources" and having students demonstrate proper manuscript formats, such as title
page, spacing and margins.

These progressive changes were made at the request of Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell, targeting the class of 2006 for quality control.

Deborah Meier, founder of New York's Central Park East schools, condemned standardized tests as failing to "measure the only important qualities of a well-educated person. ... Life scores (not math scores) based on living" should be the educator's concern.

Other educators argue that testing is "abusive," "inaccurate," "meaningless", “[an] attack on intellectual freedom” and "a highly effective means of social control."

Ignorance is the most effective means of social control that I know

When a 12th grader receives a diploma that actually represents an 8th grade education, and is relegated to an earning power that is 40% less than his high school graduated grandfather, maybe this is an act of war requiring subjugated servitude!









A New Teacher rating system

Students everywhere rate their teachers. Who is the best? Who grades the easiest? Who gives the most homework?

We often hear the taxpayers concerned with education being “dumbed” down or that our students are being indoctrinated with anti-American liberal biased twaddle. With Internet access a new twist to the teacher evaluation has surfaced—who indoctrinates!

At the University of Texas a group of conservative students, disgruntled with what it views as “an overwhelming liberal bias in higher education” has begun identifying professors who allegedly use their classes for liberal indoctrination of students.

Their concern is that instructors structure a class in an attempt to produce a certain mindset and worldview (indoctrination) verses teaching the facts and content of a course.

In an effort at full disclosure the Young Conservatives of Texas have developed the “Professor Watch List” which they publish for students to review prior to registering for classes. They also maintain a website of information on professors at http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/yct/watchlist.html.

Their instructor list is available for students before they sign up for a class and is made by students who have actually attended the class listed.

As noted, students have always been able to access information about the level of difficulty in which a particular professor teaches their class. However, at the University of Texas, the Young Conservatives of Texas (UTYCT) have added the “indoctrination bias” element to the mix.

From the UTYCT website, they state: “The Professor Watch List is designed to be a resource to the student body of the University of Texas. This report includes professors who push an ideological viewpoint on their students through oftentimes subtle but sometimes abrasive methods of indoctrination.”

Robert Jensen, from the Journalism Department, teaching “Critical Issues In Journalism” made the list. The Professor Watch List states that Jensen introduces the "unsuspecting" student to a crash course in "socialism, white privilege, the ‘truth’; about the Persian Gulf War and the role of America as the world's prominent sponsor of terrorism.”

“Jensen half-heartedly attempts to tie his rants to 'critical issues' in journalism, insisting his lessons are valid under the guise of teaching potential journalists to 'think' about the world around them.”

In an interview with the Austin American-Statesman, Jensen described himself as "left-progressive" and said he wasn't surprised to be on the list. Edmund T. Gordon, another professor who made the UTYCT Professor Watch List, teaches African-American Culture. The list comments that a black student once asked Gordon in class “what was wrong with being black and conservative?”

"Gordon implied that if you're black and conservative, you're not black enough, and you're not doing what's in the best interest of the black community," the watch list states.

The UTYCT professor watch list also includes instructors that promote Marxist economic ideology, gay rights and civil rights as being comparable movements, critical of U.S. and Israel policies favoring a pro-Palestinian bias.

Before you think that UTYCT does not have a balanced approach to their method and think that only far-left professors make their list; they also have an Honor Roll.

Sample entries from the Honor Roll include J. Budziszewksi (pronounced "BOO-jee-shef-ski"), a prominent voice on Natural Law Theory, is described as “[a] nihilist turned Christian, Budziszewski eloquently defends the natural law through foundational thinkers of Western culture including Aristotle, John Locke and St. Thomas Aquinas. He runs an intellectually challenging yet fair classroom to students of all ideologies.”

In and interview with the Austin American-Statesman Larry Faulkner, president of the University of Texas, said the UTYCT members "have the right to make the list," and the school's 30-year-old academic freedom policy allows professors "freedom to explore ideas on their own merits," so long as they do not "give undue weight" to their own political or moral judgments.

"The magic word there is 'undue,'" Faulkner told the Statesman. "That's going to be, to some extent, in the eye of the beholder."

While UTYCT’s list may be unique to the University of Texas, NoIndoctrination.org is a site providing ratings on professors at campuses across the nation.

A sampling from NoIndoctrination.org includes: UC Berkeley, UCLA, University of Central Oklahoma, Brooklyn College—The City University of New York, California Polytechnic State University—Pomona, Cornell University, Florida State University, Glendale Community College and Minneapolis Community and Technical College (MCTC).

Some professor’s take these watch lists seriously enough to dedicate time intheir classes to discuss them. Nothing like Academic Freedom.